25 October 1995
The Honourable Lucien Bouchard
A New But Original Relationship in a Common Future
Televised Speech
The people of Quebec will make on October 30 [a decision that]
will also be very important to the rest of Canada. I do
recognize and acknowledge that it will have considerable
significance for its future. Many of you will be upset on Monday
night [30 October 1995], especially if they will have shown
sympathy with Quebec. Many Quebeckers, both those who will vote
Yes and those who will vote No, will probably have been moved by
your ultimate efforts to convince Quebeckers to reaffirm their
commitment to the Canada you believe in.
Yet Quebeckers will make a decision on Monday, a decision
that they will have carefully reflected upon through a
democratic process, the fairness of which does not afford any
challenge.
If they vote Yes, they will have decided that Quebec will
become a sovereign country and will have given their national
assembly the authority to proclaim such sovereignty. But this
vote will also mean that the government of Quebec will be bound
to negotiate an economic and political partnership with the
government of Canada. Quebeckers have been preparing themselves
for these negotiations since 1990.
The national assembly and the government of Quebec have
sponsored several studies, hired many experts and consulted the
citizens on the economic, social, political and legal aspects
and consequences of Quebec accession to sovereignty. Canada must
also prepare itself for this negotiation. Like Quebec, it has
responsibilities towards its working force, its businesses and
its national/international creditors.
Canada is not deprived of resources and expertise and I
firmly believe it can speedily bring together its best minds --
men and women of good faith to sit at a table with Quebec and
negotiate what is in its best interest.
In my capacity as chief negotiator for Quebec, I can assure
all of you that I will invest all my efforts, I will give the
best of myself in this negotiation and bring it, with the able
representatives the government of Canada will appoint, fruition
rapidly.
I believe strongly in a future partnership between Canada and
Quebec and I think I can speak for an overwhelming number of
Quebeckers, if not all Quebeckers, who will also want this
negotiation to succeed after Yes. I'm deeply committed to this
partnership which will endeavour to maintain our economic and
monetary union, ensure the free flow of persons, goods, services
and capital between all parts of Canada and Quebec. I'm also
convinced that we can agree on a set of common institutions
where representatives of both countries will make decisions in
an efficient and productive manner.
On the No side, the proposal from the beginning has been that
we should choose between a sovereign Quebec and Canada as we
know it now. Right from the beginning, the leaders of No camp
have refused to suggest any change at all to the Canadian
system. Inaction has become their watchword. Mr Jean Chretien,
who blocked the way for the Quebec advance towards sovereignty
and recognition as a people each time they wanted to act as a
nation now has the gall to try to make us believe that he is
prepared to consider recognition of the distinct character of
Quebec. How can he ask us to put ourselves at his mercy by a
second No? The man who is asking us this evening for another
blank cheque on our future is the same one who took advantage of
our weaknesses after a No in 1980 to tear up the constitution of
our ancestors and to impose upon us a constitution that reduced
the powers of Quebec in the areas of language and education.
All these questions of a distinct society, of recognition of
this or that, all these word games and constitutional niceties
have been around long enough. We have wasted too much money and
time on sterile squabbles. Let us gather together all of our
energies as federalists or as sovereigntists. Let us Quebeckers
recognize ourself for what we are, a people, a vibrant country
-- proud, welcoming and confident. There are certain things that
one does not ask. It is demeaning to ask English Canada to
recognize us as a people. All that is finished. We have gone
beyond entreaties. People in English Canada and at the federal
level were able to say No to us because until now the political
weight of Quebec never counted for more than the simple weight
of an individual.
The day that we enter upon the world stage as a nation we
will achieve our true dimension, not more not less. That day,
our action will reflect all the authority that we have been
missing up to now. That day we hope with all our hearts will be
next Monday, October 30.
Then in the days to follow we'll have our first meeting
between nations -- two nations who have never really met, who
hardly know each other, will meet. That meeting will be between
Quebeckers and Canadians. They will address each other with
respect -- sovereign peoples show mutual respect. Those two
peoples will talk to each other about their mutual interest and
about what they want to deal with in common.
The talk will be of commercial exchanges -- jobs .... They
will cover the sharing of the debt contracted by Ottawa.
Quebec will repeat once more its intention to fulfil all its
financial obligations and it will act in a responsible manner.
It will confirm its commitment to take over its fair share of
the common burden. I would like in closing to reassure you, I
would even like to convince you tonight, that Quebeckers will
not choose sovereignty -- because they reject or dislike Canada
and Canadians.
And they are certainly not denying Canada a right to exist
and to flourish as a sovereign country. On the contrary, the
people of Quebec will once again be taking the initiative of the
reform, albeit the reform that will see negotiations and will
see Quebec negotiate on -- an equal footing with Canada.
For our peoples, this will be an historic moment, the first
authentic meeting of our two collective minds. And negotiations
will be a challenge to our creativity and an invitation to
continue to share through a new but original relationship in a
common future.