1939 France's Response to
Germany's Invasion of Poland
(1) Address by Edouard Daladier, Premier, in the
Chamber of Deputies, September 2, 1939.
(2) Telephone communication from Robert Coulondre,
French Ambassador to Germany, to the French Minister for
Foreign Affairs (Georges Bonnet), September 3, 1939
(3) Statement by Edouard Daladier, Premier, to the
Nation, September 3, 1939
(1) Address by Edouard Daladier, Premier, in the
Chamber of Deputies, September 2, 1939.
Gentlemen,
The Government yesterday decreed general
mobilization.
The whole nation is answering the call with serious
and resolute calm. The young men have rejoined their
regiments. They are now defending our frontiers. The
example of dignified courage which they have just set to
the world must provide inspiration for our debates. In a
great impulse of national brotherliness they have
forgotten everything which only yesterday could divide
them. They no longer acknowledge any service but the
service of France. As we send them the grateful greeting
of the nation let us all pledge ourselves together to be
worthy of them.
Thus has the Government put France into a position to
act in accordance with our vital interests and with
national honor.
It has now the duty of setting forth before you the
facts as they are, fully, frankly, and clearly.
Peace had been endangered for several days. The
demands of Germany on Poland were threatening to provoke
a conflict. I shall show you in a moment how - perhaps
for the first in time history - all the peaceful forces
of the world, moral and material, were leagued together
during those days and during those nights to save the
world's peace. But just when it could still be hoped
that all those repeated efforts were going to be crowned
with success, Germany abruptly brought them to naught.
During the day of August 31 the crisis reached its
peak. When Germany had at last let Great Britain know
that she agreed to hold direct negotiation with Poland,
a course which she had , let it be said, refused to me,
Poland, in spite of the terrible threat created by the
sudden armed invasion of Slovakia by the German forces,
at one endeavored to resort to this peaceful method. At
one o'clock in the afternoon M. Lipski, the Polish
Ambassador to Germany, requested an audience from Herr
von Ribbentrop. Peace seemed to be saved. But the Reich
Minister for Foreign Affairs would not receive M. Lipski
till 7:45 P.M., seven hours later. While the latter was
bringing the consent of his Government to direct
conversations, the German Minister refused to
communicate Germany's claims to the Polish Ambassador,
on the pretext that the Ambassador had not full powers
to accept or reject them on the spot.
At 9 P.M. the German wireless was communicating the
nature and the full extent of these claims; it added
that Poland had rejected them. That is a lie. That is a
lie, since Poland did not even know them.
And at dawn on September 1 the Fuhrer gave his troops
the order to attack. Never was aggression more
unmistakable and less warranted; nor for its
justification could more lies and cynicism have been
brought into play.
Thus was wear unleashed at the time when the most
noteworthy forces, the authorities who ewre at the same
time the most respected and the most impartial, had
ranged themselves in the service of peace; at the time
when the whole world had joined together to induce the
two sides to come into direct contact so as to settle
peacefully the conflict which divides them.
The Head of Christianity had given voice to reason
and feelings of brotherhood; President Roosevelt had
sent moving messages and proposed a general conference
to all countries; the neutral countries had been active
in offering their impartial good offices. Need I say
that to each of these appeals the French Government gave
an immediate welcome and complete assent?
I myself, Gentlemen, if I may be allowed a reference
to my own person, thought it my duty as a Frenchman to
approach Herr Hitler directly. The Head of the German
Government had let me know on August 25, through M.
Coulondre, our Ambassador in Berlin, that he deplored
the fact that in case of an armed conflict between
Germany and Poland, German blood and French blood might
be shed. I immediately had a definite proposal put to
the Fuhrer, a proposal wholly inspired by the real
concern to safeguard without any delay the peace of the
world now imperiled.
You were able to read, I think in fact that you must
have read these texts. You know the answer I was given;
I will not dwell on it.
But we were not disheartened by the failure of this
step, and once more we backed up the effort to which Mr.
Chamberlain devoted himself with splendid stubbornness.
The documents exchanged between London and Berlin have
been published. On the one side impartial and
persevering loyalty; on the other side, embarrassment,
shifty and shirking behavior. I am also happy at this
juncture to pay my tribute to the noble efforts made by
the Italian Government. Even yesterday we strove to
unite all men of goodwill so as at least to stave off
hostilities, to prevent bloodshed and to ensure that the
methods of conciliation and arbitration should be
substituted for the use of violence.
Gentlemen, these efforts towards peace, however
powerless they were and still remain, will at least have
shown where the responsibility lies. They insure for
Poland, the victim, the effective co-operation and moral
support of the nations and of free men of all lands.
What we did before the beginning of this war, we are
ready to do once more. If renewed steps are taken
towards conciliation, we are still ready to join in.
If the fighting were to stop, if the aggressor were
to retreat within his own frontiers, if free
negotiations could still be started, you may well
believe, Gentlemen, the French Government would spare no
effort to ensure, even today, if it were possible, the
success of these negotiations, in the interests of the
peace of the world.
But the time is pressing; France and England cannot
look on when a friendly nation is being destroyed, a
foreboding of further onslaughts, eventually aimed at
England and France.
Indeed, are we only dealing with the German-Polish
conflict? We are not, Gentlemen; what we have to deal
with is a new stage in the advance of the Hitler
dictatorship towards the domination of Europe and the
world. How, indeed, are we to forget that the German
claim to the Polish territories had been long marked on
the map of Greater Germany, and that it was only
concealed for some years to facilitate other conquests?
so long as the German-Polish Pact, which dates back only
a few years, was profitable to Germany, Germany
respected it; on the day when it became a hindrance to
marching towards domination it was denounced
unhesitatingly. To-day we are told that, once the German
claims against Poland were satisfied, Germany would
pledge herself before the whole world for ten, for
twenty, for twenty-five years, for all time, to restore
or to respect peace. Unfortunately, we have heard such
promises before!
On May 25, 1935, Chancellor Hitler pledged himself
not to interfere in the internal affairs of Austria and
not to unite Austria to the Reich; and on March 11,
1938, the German army entered Vienna; Chancellor
Shuschnigg was imprisoned for daring to defend his
country's independence, and no one to-day can say what
is his real fate after so many physical and moral
sufferings. Now we are to believe that it was Dr.
Schuschnigg's acts of provocation that brought about the
invasion and enslavement of his country!
On September 12, 1938, Herr Hitler declared that the
Sudeten problem was an internal matter which concerned
only the German minority in Bohemia and the Czechoslovak
Government. A few days later he maintained that he
violent persecutions carried on by the Czechs were
compelling him to change his policy.
On September 26 of the same year he declared that his
claim on the Sudeten territory was the last territorial
claim he had to make in Europe. On March 14, 1939, Herr
Hacha was summoned to Berlin: ordered under the most
stringent pressure to accept an ultimatum. A few hours
later Prague was being occupied in contempt of the
signed pledges given to other countries in Western
Europe. In this case also Herr Hitler endeavored to put
on the victims the onus which in fact lies on the
aggressor.
Finally, on January 30, 1939, Herr Hitler spoke in
loud praise of the non-aggression pact which he had
signed five years previously with Poland. He paid a
tribute to this agreement as a common act of liberation,
and solemnly confirmed his intention to respect its
clauses.
But it is Herr Hitler's deeds that count, not his
word.
What, then, is our duty? Poland is our ally. We
entered into commitments with her in 1921 and 1925.
These commitments were confirmed.
I, myself, in the Chamber said, on May 11 last:
"As a result of the journey of the Polish Minister
for Foreign Affairs to London and of the reciprocal
pledges of guarantee given by Great Britain and Poland,
by a common agreement with this noble and brave nation
we tool the measures required for the immediate and
direct application of our treaty of alliance."
Parliament approved this policy.
Since then we have never failed both in diplomatic
negotiations and in public utterances, to prove faithful
to it. Our Ambassador in Berlin has several times
reminded Herr Hitler that, if a German aggression were
to take place against Poland, we should fulfill our
pledges. And on July 1, in Paris, the Minister for
Foreign Affairs said to the German Ambassador to France:
"France has definite commitments to Poland. These
engagements have been further strengthened as a result
of the latest events, and consequently France will at
once be at Poland's side as soon at Poland herself takes
up arms."
Poland has been the object of the most unjust and
brutal aggression. The nations who have guaranteed her
independence are bound to intervene in her defense.
Great Britain and France are not Powers that can
disown, or dream of disowning, their signatures.
Already last night, on September 1, the French and
British Ambassadors were making a joint overture to the
German Government. They handed to Herr von Ribbentrop
the following communication from the French Government
and the British Government, which I will ask your leave
to read to you:
"Early this morning the German Chancellor issued a
proclamation to the German Army which indicated that he
was about to attack Poland.
"Information which has reached His Majesty's
Government in the United Kingdom and the French
Government indicates that attacks upon Polish towns are
proceeding.
"In these circumstances it appears to the Governments
of the United Kingdom and France that by their action
the German Government have created conditions, (viz., an
aggressive act of force against Poland threatening the
independence of Poland) which call for the
implementation by the Government of the United Kingdom
and France of the undertaking to Poland to come to her
assistance.
"I am accordingly to inform your Excellency that
unless the German Government are prepared to give His
Majesty's Government satisfactory assurances that the
German Government have suspended all aggressive action
against Poland and are prepared promptly to withdraw
their forces from Polish territory, His Majesty's
Government in the United Kingdom will without hesitation
fulfill their obligations to Poland."
And indeed, Gentlemen, it is not only the honor of
our country: it is also the protection of its vital
interests that is at stake.
For a France which should allow this aggression to be
carried out would very soon find itself a scorned, an
isolated, a discredited France, without allies and
without support, and doubtless, would soon herself be
exposed to a formidable attack.
This is the question I lay before the French nation,
and all nations. At the very moment of the aggression
against Poland, what value has the guarantee, once more
renewed, given for our eastern frontier, for our Alsace,
for our Lorraine, after repudiation of the guarantees
given in turn to Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland?
More powerful through their conquests, gorged with the
plunder of Europe, the masters of inexhaustible natural
wealth, the aggressors would soon turn against France
with all their forces.
Thus, our honor is but the pledge of our own society.
It is not that abstract and obsolete form of honor of
which conquerors speak to justify their deeds of
violence; it is the dignity of a peaceful people, which
bears hatred toward no other people in the world and
which never embarks upon a war save only for the sake of
its freedom and of its life.
Forfeiting our honor would purchase nothing more than
a precious peace liable to rescission, and when,
tomorrow, we should have to fight after losing the
respect of our allies and the other nations, we should
no longer be anything more than a wretched people doomed
to defeat and bondage.
I feel confident that not a single Frenchman harbors
such thoughts today. But I well know, too, Gentlemen,
that it is hard for those who have devoted their whole
lives to the cause of peace and who are still prompted
by a peaceful ideal to reply, by force if needed, to
deeds of violence. As head of the Government, I am not
the man to make an apology for war in these tragic
hours. I fought before like most of you. I can remember.
I shall not utter a single one of those words that the
genuine fighters look upon as blasphemous. But I desire
to do my plain duty, and shall do it, as an honorable
man.
Gentlemen, while we are in session, Frenchmen are
rejoining their regiments. Not one of them feels any
hatred in his heart against the German people. Not one
of them is giving way to the intoxicating call of
violence and brutality; but they are ready, unanimously,
to discharge their duty with the quiet courage which
derives its inspiration from a clear conscience.
Gentlemen, you who know what those Frenchmen are
thinking, you who even yesterday were among them in our
provincial towns and in our countryside, you who have
seen them go off - you will not contradict me if I evoke
their feelings here. They are peace- loving men, but
they have decided to make every sacrifice needed to
defend the dignity and freedom of their country. If they
have answered our call, as they have done, without a
moment's hesitation, without a murmur, without
flinching, that is because they feel, all of them, in
the depths of their hearts that it is, in truth,
whatever may be said, the very existence of France that
is at stake.
You know better than anyone else that no government,
no man, would be able to mobilize France merely to
launch her into an adventure. Never would the French
rise to invade the territory of a foreign country.
Theirs is the heroism for defense and not for conquest.
When you see France spring to arms it is because she
feels herself threatened.
It is not France only that has arisen; it is the
whole, far- flung empire under the sheltering folds of
our tricolour. From every corner of the globe moving
protestations of loyalty from all the protected or
friendly races are reaching the mother country today.
The union of all Frenchmen is thus echoed beyond the
seas by the union of all people under our protection who
in the hour of danger are proffering both their arms and
their hearts. And I wish also to salute all the
foreigners settled on our soil, who on this very day in
their thousands and thousands, as though they were the
volunteers of imperiled freedom, are placing their
courage and their lives at the service of France.
Our duty is to make an end of aggressive and violent
undertakings; by means of peaceful settlement, if we can
still do so, and this we shall strive our utmost to
achieve, by the wielding of our strength, if all sense
of morality as well as all glimmering of reason has died
within the aggressors.
If we were not to keep our pledges, if we were to
allow Germany to crush Poland, within a few months,
perhaps within a few weeks, what could we say to France,
if we had to face aggressors once more? Then would those
most determined soldiers ask us what we had done with
our friends. They would feel themselves alone, under the
most dreadful threat, and might lose, perhaps for all
time, the confidence which now spurs them on.
Gentlemen, in these hours when the fate of Europe is
in the balance, France is speaking to us through the
voice of her sons, through the voice of all those who
have already accepted, if need be, the greatest
sacrifice of all. Let us recapture, as they have done,
that spirit which fired all the heroes of our history.
France rises with such impetuous impulses only when she
feels in her heart that she is fighting for her life and
for her independence.
Gentlemen, today France is in command.
(2) Telephone communication from Robert Coulondre,
French Ambassador to Germany, to the French Minister for
Foreign Affairs (Georges Bonnet), September 3, 1939
I have the honor to confirm as here below the
communication which I made to Your Excellency by
telephone at 1 P.M.
Herr von Ribbentrop returned at noon. I was received
at this hour by the State Secretary, but the latter
informed me that he was not in a position to tell me
whether a satisfactory reply had been made to my letter
of September 1, nor even whether such a reply could be
given thereto. He insisted that I should see Herr von
Ribbentrop himself. In these circumstances I asked to be
received by the Minister for Foreign Affairs at the
earliest possible moment.
I was received by Herr von Ribbentrop at 12:30 P.M.
I asked him whether he could give me a satisfactory
reply to my letter which I had handed to him on
September 1 at 10 P.M.
He replied to me as follows:
"After the delivery of your letter, the Italian
Government notified the German Government of a proposed
compromise, stating that the French Government was in
agreement. Later, Signor Mussolini intimated to us that
the contemplated compromise had failed owning to British
intransigence. This morning the British Ambassador
handed us an ultimatum, due to expire two hours later,
We rejected it for the reason which is explained in the
memorandum which I handed to the British Ambassador
today and of which I give you a copy.
"If the French Government feels bound by its
commitments to Poland to enter into the conflict, I can
only regret it, for we have no feeling of hostility
towards France. It is only if France attacks us that we
shall fight her, and this would be on her part a war of
aggression."
I then asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if I
was to infer from his utterances that the reply of the
Government of the Reich to may letter of September 1 was
in the negative. "Yes," he replied.
"In these circumstances I must, on behalf of my
Government, remind you for the last time of the heavy
responsibility assumed by the Government of the Reich by
entering, without a declaration of war, into hostilities
against Poland and in not acting upon the suggestion
made by the Governments of the French Republic and of
His Britannic Majesty to suspend all aggressive action
against Poland and to declare itself ready to withdraw
its forces promptly from Polish territory.
"I have the painful duty to notify you that as from
today, September 3, at 5 P.M., the French Government
will find itself obliged to fulfill the obligations that
France has contracted towards Poland, and which are
known to the German Government.
" 'Well,' Herr von Ribbentrop remarked, 'it will be
France who is the aggressor.' "
I replied to him that history would judge of that.
(3) Statement by Edouard Daladier, Premier, to the
Nation, September 3, 1939
Men and Women of France.
Since daybreak on September 1, Poland has been the
victim of the most brutal and most cynical of
aggression. Her frontiers have been violated. Her cities
are being bombed. Her army is heroically resisting the
invader.
The responsibility for the blood that is being shed
falls entirely upon the Hitler Government. The fate of
peace is in Hitler's hands. He chose war.
France and England have made countless efforts to
safeguard peace. This very morning they made a further
urgent intervention in Berlin in order to address to the
German Government a last appeal to reason and request it
to stop hostilities and to open peaceful negotiations.
Germany met us with a refusal. She had already
refused to reply to all the men of goodwill who recently
raised their voices in favor of the peace of the world.
She therefore desires the destruction of Poland, so
as to be able to dominate Europe quickly and to enslave
France.
In rising against the most frightful of tyrannies, in
honoring our word, we fight to defend our soil, our
homes, our liberties.
I am conscious of having worked unremittingly against
the war until the last minute.
I greet with emotion and affection our young
soldiers, who now go forth to perform the sacred task
which we ourselves did perform before them. They can
have full confidence in their chiefs, who are worthy of
those who have previously led France to victory.
The cause of France is identical with that of
Righteousness. It is the cause of all peaceful and free
nations. It will be victorious.
Men and Women of France!
We are waging war because it has been thrust on us.
Every one of us is at his post, on the soil of France,
on that land of liberty where respect of human dignity
finds one of its last refuges. You will all co-operate,
with a profound feeling of union and brotherhood, for
the salvation of the country.
Vive la France!