1937 Franklin D. Roosevelt
Quarantine Speech
The President's Address in Chicago, October 5, 1937
I am glad to come once again to Chicago and
especially to have the opportunity of taking part in the
dedication of this important project of civic
betterment.
On my trip across the continent and back I have been
shown many evidences of the result of common sense
cooperation between municipalities and the Federal
government, and I have been greeted by tens of thousands
of Americans who have told me in every look and word
that their material and spiritual well-being has made
great strides forward in the past few years.
And yet, as I have seen with my own eyes, the
prosperous farms, the thriving factories and the busy
railroads - as I have seen the happiness and security
and peace which covers our wide land, almost inevitably
I have been compelled to contrast our peace with very
different scenes being enacted in other parts of the
world.
It is because the people of the United States under
modern conditions must, for the sake of their own
future, give thought to the rest of the world, that I,
as the responsible executive head of the nation, have
chosen this great inland city and this gala occasion to
speak to you on a subject of definite national
importance.
The political situation in the world, which of late
has been growing progressively worse, is such as to
cause grave concern and anxiety to all the peoples and
nations who wish to live in peace and amity with their
neighbors.
Some 15 years ago the hopes of mankind for a
continuing era of international peace were raised to
great heights when more than 60 nations solemnly pledged
themselves not to resort to arms in furtherance of their
national aims and policies. The high aspirations
expressed in the Briand-Kellogg Pact and the hopes for
peace thus raised have of late given way to a haunting
fear of calamity. The present reign of terror and
international lawlessness began a few years ago.
It began through unjustified interference in the
internal affairs of other nations or the invasion of
alien territory in violation of treaties. It has now
reached the stage where the very foundation of
civilization are seriously threatened. The landmarks,
the traditions which have marked the progress of
civilization toward a condition of law and order and
justice are being wiped away.
Without a declaration of war and without warning or
justification of any kind, civilians, including vast
numbers of women and children, are being ruthlessly
murdered with bombs from the air. In times of so-called
peace, ships are being attacked and sunk by submarines
without cause or notice. Nations are fomenting and
taking sides in civil warfare in nations that have never
done them any harm. Nations claiming freedom for
themselves deny it to others.
Innocent peoples, innocent nations are being cruelly
sacrificed to a greed for power and supremacy which is
devoid of all sense of justice and humane
considerations.
To paraphrase a recent author, "perhaps we foresee a
time when men, exultant in the technique of homicide,
will rage hotly over the world that every precious thing
will be in danger, every book, every picture, every
harmony, every treasure garnered through two
millenniums, the small, the delicate, the defenseless -
all will be lost or wrecked or utterly destroyed."
If those things come to pass in other parts of the
world, let no one imagine that America will escape, that
America may expect mercy, that this Western hemisphere
will not be attacked and that it will continue
tranquilly and peacefully to carry on the ethics and the
arts of civilization.
No, if those days come, "there will be no safety by
arms, no help from authority, no answer in science. The
storm will rage until every flower of culture is
trampled and all human beings are leveled in a vast
chaos."
If those days are not to come to pass - if we are to
have a world in which we can breathe freely and live in
amity without fear - then the peace-loving nations must
make a concerted effort to uphold laws and principles on
which alone peace can rest secure.
The peace-loving nations must make a concerted effort
in opposition to those violations of treaties and those
ignorings of human instincts which today are creating a
state of international anarchy and instability from
which there is no escape through mere isolation or
neutrality.
Those who cherish their freedom and recognize and
respect the equal right of their neighbors to be free
and live in peace, must work together for the triumph of
law and moral principles in order that peace, justice,
and confidence may prevail throughout the world. There
must be a return to a belief in the pledged word, in the
value of a signed treaty. There must be recognition of
the fact that national morality is as vital as private
morality.
A bishop wrote me the other day: "It seems to me that
something greatly needs to be said in behalf of ordinary
humanity against the present practice of carrying the
horrors of war to helpless civilians, especially women
and children. It may be that such a protest might be
regarded by many, who claim to be realists, as futile,
but may it not be that the heart of mankind is so filled
with horror at the present needless suffering that that
force could be mobilized in sufficient volume to lessen
such cruelty in the days ahead. Even though it may take
20 years, which God forbid, for civilization to make
effective its corporate protest against this barbarism,
surely strong voices may hasten the day."
There is a solidarity and interdependence about the
modern world, both technically and morally, which makes
it impossible for any nation completely to isolate
itself from economic and political upheavals in the rest
of the world, especially when such upheavals appear to
be spreading and not declining. There can be no
stability or peace either within nations or between
nations except under laws and moral standards adhered to
by all. International anarchy destroys every foundation
for peace. It jeopardizes either the immediate or the
future security of every nation, large or small. It is,
therefore, a matter of vital interest and concern to the
people of the United States that the sanctity of
international treaties and the maintenance of
international morality be restored.
The overwhelming majority of the peoples and nations
of the world today want to live in peace. They seek the
removal of barriers against trade. They want to exert
themselves in industry, in agriculture and in business,
that they may increase their wealth through the
production of wealth-producing goods rather than
striving to produce military planes and bombs and
machine guns and cannon for the destruction of human
lives and useful property.
In those nations of the world which seem to be piling
armament on armament for purposes of aggression, and
those other nations which fear acts of aggression
against them and their security, a very high proportion
of their national income is being spent directly for
armaments. It runs from 30 to as high as 50 per cent.
The proportion that we in the United States spend is far
less - 11 or 12 per cent.
How happy we are that the circumstances of the moment
permit us to put our money into bridges and boulevards,
dams and reforestation, the conservation of our soil,
and many other kinds of useful works rather than into
huge standing armies and vast supplies of implements of
war.
Nevertheless, my friends, I am compelled, as you are
compelled, to look ahead. The peace, the freedom, and
the security of 90 per cent of the population of the
world is being jeopardized by the remaining 10 per cent
who are threatening a breakdown of all international
order and law. Surely the 90 per cent who want to live
in peace under law and in accordance with moral
standards that have received almost universal acceptance
through the centuries, can and must find some way to
make their will prevail.
The situation is definitely of universal concern. The
questions involved relate not merely to violations of
specific provisions of particular treaties; they are
questions of war and of peace, of international law and
especially of principles of humanity. It is true that
they involve definite violations of agreements, and
especially of the Covenant of the League of Nations, the
Briand-Kellogg Pact and the Nine Power Treaty. But they
also involve problems of world economy, world security
and world humanity.
It is true that the moral consciousness of the world
must recognize the importance of removing injustices and
well-founded grievances; but at the same time it must be
aroused to the cardinal necessity of honoring sanctity
of treaties, of respecting the rights and liberties of
others and of putting an end to acts of international
aggression.
It seems to be unfortunately true that the epidemic
of world lawlessness is spreading.
AND MARK THIS WELL: When an epidemic of physical
disease starts to spread, the community approves and
joins in a quarantine of the patients in order to
protect the health of the community against the spread
of the disease.
It is my determination to pursue a policy of peace
and to adopt every practicable measure to avoid
involvement in war. It ought to be inconceivable that in
this modern era, and in the face of experience, any
nation could be so foolish and ruthless as to run the
risk of plunging the whole world into war by invading
and violating, in contravention of solemn treaties, the
territory of other nations that have done them no real
harm and are too weak to protect themselves adequately.
Yet the peace of the world and the welfare and security
of every nation are today being threatened by that very
thing.
No nation which refuses to exercise forbearance and
to respect the freedom and rights of others can long
remain strong and retain the confidence and respect of
other nations. No nation every loses its dignity or its
good standing by conciliating its differences, and by
exercising great patience with, and consideration for,
the rights of other nations.
War is a contagion, whether it be declared or
undeclared. It can engulf states and peoples remote from
the original scene of hostilities. We are determined to
keep out of war, yet we cannot insure ourselves against
the disastrous effects of war and the dangers of
involvement. We are adopting such measures as will
minimize our risk of involvement, but we cannot have
complete protection in a world of disorder in which
confidence and security have broken down.
If civilization is to survive, the principles of the
Prince of Peace must be restored. Shattered trust
between nations must be revived.
Most important of all, the will for peace on the part
of peace-loving nations must express itself to the end
that nations that may be tempted to violate their
agreements and the rights of others will desist from
such a course. There must be positive endeavors to
preserve peace.